Maxillary Implants (published 1977)   Dr. Leonard I. Linkow

Previous Page Next Page




 

19

20

axis should bisect the narrowest portion of the ridge (18), moving it more labially than is otherwise recommended.

Two short blades may be preferable to one long, double-posted design in an area with a deep or an irregular concavity. Each blade can be inserted to its best advantage (19, 20). A single, long groove might compromise the best options for each site.

No matter which option is selected, a thumb or finger bracing the concavity is recommended while drilling the socket and seating the implant (21). The area may not only be shallower, but also considerably weaker.

Problem Ridge: Uneven Height

 

Variations in bone height are readily detected radiographically. Many prosthodontic problems arising from unequal height are more properly compensated in the prosthesis. Surgically the difficulties depend principally upon where adequate height and width remain, and the length of the edentulous span.

Usually the anterior ridge is at least as tall as the posterior, and in most cases it is taller (1). However, traumatic loss of the incisors or canines, or uneven distribution of masticatory forces can cause excessive resorption of the anterior maxillary processes (2 ).

The loss of height may be limited to one area. For example, the vestiges of a single extraction site may produce a pronounced dip (3) in the crest. This feature is often accompanied by lateral recession of the walls of the socket, particularly the labial one (4). If the site is prosthodontically desirable and not too narrow, the implant groove should be centered in the narrower area (5) and directed palatally, and the situation treated as a narrow ridge implantation.

An atypical design — the open-socket bladevent — is appropriate. The open-socket blade is inserted as is any other blade-vent. The groove must follow the dental arch, and bisect the ridge at its narrowest point. The recessed shoulder (6) must be set beyond the dip in the ridge, firmly in bone. The design is double-posted, so that occlusal forces (7) will be directed into the stronger bone on either side of the defect.

1

81

1 Two short implant blades preferable in area with an irregular concavity
2 Thumb or finger bracing the concavity while seating maxillary implant
3 Resorption of anterior maxillary processes after traumatic tooth loss



Previous Page Page 81 Next Page
Copyright warning: This information is presented here for free for anyone to study online. We own exclusive internet copyrights on all content presented on this website. We use sophisticated technology to identify and legally close down websites that reproduce copyrighted content without permission - so please don’t do it.